United Arts Agency | UAA

Category Archives: Call for Artists

America Ferrera to star as Ana Mendieta in “Naked by the Window”

Following what was an extremely impactful year for the actor with her staggering performance in Barbie, America Ferrera is slated to star as Cuban artist Ana Mendieta in the upcoming series Naked by the Window. An Amazon MGM Studios production, it adapts the book of the same name by Robert Katz.

 

Ana Mendieta was a multi-disciplinary artist born in Havana who came into the public eye in New York City with her combination of installation, performance art, and video. She was one of the prominent figures in the medium known as land art, or what she called earth/body sculptures. Utilizing her body in conjunction with natural elements as a sort of canvas, most notably in her Silueta Series, she sought to draw attention to the inherent connection of humanity to the land and drew on Afro-Cuban cultural influences in these endeavours. Her works often evoked themes of feminism, violence towards women, and death.

 

Mendieta had been married to sculptor Carl Andre, and in 1985, she died falling from the window of his 34th-floor apartment. With neighbours having reported violent arguing before her death, along with the presence of scratch marks on Andre’s face, Mendieta being heard crying out, and what seems now like a flimsy 911 call from Andre, it is hard not to assume what has happened. He was acquitted of second-degree murder, but public opinion of him has not been kind with a steady resistance to his work being exhibited ever since.

 

Toting an Oscar nomination for her performance as Gloria in Barbie, as well as an award-winning career across decades of TV and poised for her own directorial debut with I Am Not Your Perfect Mexican Daughter, Ferrera is sure to bring her iconic heart and wit to honour the energy of Ana Mendieta in Naked by the Window.

Christie’s Elton John auction has dazzling opening night

It’s not hard to see the aesthetic value in musicians of the 1960s and 70s—pageantry was at its first true peak for modern music and with it came objects and visuals of decadence not yet seen in the century. With these artists also came a blurring of the line between popular culture and high culture, a strange new class of ultra-elites that wore their fame on their sleeves and became subjects of critical analysis and appreciation. So it is no surprise that an Elton John auction would blow the roof off the joint as much as any of his shows would.

 

Elton John, the piano-pounding glam and pop rocker who has scored hit after hit with lyricist Bernie Taupin, has a signature style all his own. With his characteristic tinted glasses, vibrant costuming, and electric stage presence, he has captivated audiences across generations as a beacon of joy, poignancy, and queer stardom.

 

Christie’s Elton John auction series features items from across the artist’s work, luxury goods, and clothing. While it runs till February 28th, on its opening night of the 21st it saw every single one of the 49 items on offer sell to a sum of $8 million. Many of the offerings fetched astronomically more than they were estimated at, including a pair of his prescription glasses and silver leather platform boots sporting his initials.

 

Two of the standouts for the event were Banksy’s Flower Thrower Triptych—perhaps the most iconic image by the legendary street artist—going for nearly $2 million, and Elton’s old wheels, a 1990 Bentley Continental, fetching $441,000.

 

With the Elton John auction series continuing into next week, its sum total is sure to climb well past opening night as people grab a piece of rock and roll history. With comments that the energy of the auction itself was electric with energy, it’s clear that the fervour for this beloved artist shines as bright as his sequins.

Odysseus makes landing with Jeff Koons’ “Moon Phases”

Humanity’s relationship with putting our mark on the universe at large grows more prominent with each step forward our technologies take. From claiming stars as gifts to launching a gaudy car into orbit, we’ve reached a new milestone as a planet in both travel and imprint: Odysseus, a lunar lander by Intuitive Machines, has touched down on the moon bearing the first commercial payloads to our satellite.

 

Odysseus is the first of a series of lunar landers designated Nova-C, designed specifically for small-scale payloads to the moon. Odysseus launched on February 21st and landed on the 22nd in a small crater on the south pole of the moon. Not long after it appears that the lander fell on its side, but it is apparently still operational for the scientific applications NASA and others have intended for it.

 

Notable on this payload is a project by Jeff Koons, and it is thankfully a degree less gaudy than sending a metal balloon animal into space. Still in the vein of the artist’s repertoire, Moon Phases is a series of 125 miniature stainless steel models of the phases of the moon. The collection is housed in a cube designed and built by 4Space, a company seemingly seeking to collaborate with artists and brands in this new era of commercial space travel. Each of the models has a label honouring significant individuals in human history across the globe, and, in Intuitive Machines’ words, “Koons honors some of the greatest achievements of the past to inspire future generations.”

 

It is hard to posit whether Odysseus’ success is a positive sign for the future. While a successful joint effort between the rich and existing space exploration agencies, it is a sizeable amount of money to send to a dead rock for the sake of aesthetic memory. But it’s still more tactful than that Roadster.

Monaghan & Boyd astound in Neptune Theatre’s “Rosencrantz & Guildenstern”

If you were to tell me years ago that one of the biggest draws to Nova Scotia’s premiere regional theatre in 2024 would be a pair of hobbits, I would’ve told you to lay off the pipe-weed. And when Neptune Theatre first announced that Dominic Monaghan and Billy Boyd would be starring in the modern classic Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, few could believe it. But the event quickly took the city by storm for a sold-out run, and the hype was absolutely to be believed.

 

Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead is the beloved play by iconic playwright Tom Stoppard and is a meta-narrative reflection on two of the seemingly most inconsequential characters in Hamlet. Taking place primarily in a liminal space offstage during the moments in between the action of Hamlet, it follows the inane existential bumblings of the titular pair as they try to navigate their roles in the world of the play. Originally an Edinburgh Fringe production in 1966, this fascinating examination of mortality, existence, and the legendary play itself has held a rabid devotion by the Western theatre for decades.

 

 

To get the most obvious statement out of the way, Monaghan and Boyd are superb in their performances. There is a conversational ease between them playing off one another that sparks and titillates, giving the energy of a Shakespearean Fry and Laurie. Their humour is effortless, their pace galloping, and their immersion in the transient world unmistakable. Yet despite being masters of the wit and wonder this strange play provides, the stakes and truly weighty significance that arise from their pondering are never far from the surface. Monaghan and Boyd give a class act in absurdism and deliver unanswered questions with stupefying grins.

 

Neptune’s artistic director Jeremy Webb serves as director for the piece, and you can see the influence of his history as a creator and performer. Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead is very much an actor’s play, and the vision of this production puts the onus on this captivatingly. From the simplistic set of rotating risers varyingly cloaked in scrim (designed by Andrew Cull), to the mechanics of bodies in space (beautifully orchestrated by movement director Angela Gasparetto) punctuating the scenes of the acting troupe, to the luxuriating in silence and levity in a space where there is nowhere else to go—it all amounts to a spectacle of emotional and intellectual craft.

 

 

A thing of note in the energy of this production was the dichotomy between Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and the rest of the characters. There are essentially two worlds to this play: that of Stoppard’s modernist existentialism in the wings and that of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Boyd and Monaghan assuredly occupy the former with their performances, but even those who share in their scenes—most obviously The Player, played by Michael Blake—all seem to occupy the latter. There is a decidedly “Shakespearian” and grand energy to their delivery. And this is not to the detriment of the production, Blake particularly wearing this with a lupine flare. But it does form an interesting bubble around Boyd and Monaghan, underlining the way that these characters feel universally misplaced.

 

Neptune’s production of Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead is truly a shining gem across the theatre’s long history. When an event can get non-theatre-goers rushing for tickets, it’s an enlivening thing to see in this day and age. It means all the more when the piece truly does live up to expectations, and Dominic Monaghan and Billy Boyd truly deliver cerebral magic.

 

The production tours to Toronto’s Mirvish Theatre from March 5th to 31st.

January & February Member Spotlight: MacArthur Foundation

In April 2023, the Chicago Commitment at the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation launched A Road Together (ART), our regranting partnership with the Field Foundation. Field will regrant $15 million in MacArthur funds over the next five years to offer general operating support to small and mid-sized arts and culture organizations in Chicago with a strong commitment to equity.

Through this regranting partnership, we aim to see a more equitable distribution of MacArthur’s Chicago Commitment resources across the city’s geographies and populations and greater diversity in the organizations that MacArthur supports overall. The ART grantmaking program aligns with our goal to invest in people, places, and partnerships to advance racial equity and build a more inclusive Chicago.

The ART program with Field is a multimillion-dollar investment in Chicago’s arts and culture sector made by MacArthur as part of its Culture, Equity, and the Arts (CEA) program. Field regrants MacArthur funds through the ART program to organizations with budgets of less than $1 million, while Chicago-based organizations with annual budgets of $1 million and above may apply directly to MacArthur’s CEA program. Both programs aim to share power through participatory grantmaking processes. Moving forward, nearly all CEA funding will be offered in the form of general operating support, which is essential for stability, sustainability, and the ability to innovate.

We look forward to the announcement of our next round of Culture, Equity, and the Arts grants in March 2024. And, as a member of Grantmakers in the Arts for 12 years, we are excited to share our work and learn from others at the 2024 GIA conference in Chicago.

Learn more about MacArthur’s Chicago Commitment program.

You can learn more about the MacArthur Foundation on the photo credits page.

Poor Things is an electric, eclectic, esoteric spark of life

2023 was a ripe year for cinema—one need only look at the truly all-consuming cultural event that was Barbenheimmer to see that. Both films offered two entirely different experiences that somehow shared much of the same existential heart and seemed slated to be the contenders for best film of the year. But just as the year came to its close, along came an offering that has turned heads—and opinions—with its truly unique experience: Poor Things.

 

Poor Things, directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (The Lobster, The Killing of a Sacred Deer) and both produced by and starring Emma Stone, is an absolutely electric affair of joy, loss, sex, and introspection. Its story—whose screenplay was written by Tony McNamara based on the novel of the same name by Alasdair Gray—is an exploration within the framework of Frankenstein. We follow the creation Bella Baxter (Emma Stone), a woman reanimated by Godwin “God” Baxter (Willem Dafoe) after a suicide attempt. As Bella’s mind grows rapidly, so too does her interest in the world’s offerings. Across her globe-trotting journey her mind becomes sharper and her experiences more broad, but all still centre around growing questions of humanity, love, purpose, mortality, and sexuality.

 

Willem Dafoe in POOR THINGS. Photo by Yorgos Lanthimos. Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2023 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

 

What is most thematically striking first in Poor Things is the bluntness of its sexual content. A key component from the start, it is handled in a manner that is all at once erotic, mundane, absurd, and humorous. With a recurrent theme of womanhood and parenthood, it is a logical concept to recur, but it is rare to see it handled in such an evocative manner without existing for cheap thrills. Bella navigates the entire spectrum of understanding one’s own sexual being from (metaphorical) inception through to a point of contemplation few allow themselves, using the pitifully wretched playboy of Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo) and a rotating door of individuals as a mirror to knowing herself.

 

Equal in surprise and delight is the film’s use of a fantastical history and anachronistic elements. It is subtly and slowly revealed that this is not the Victorian age with minor technological wonders sequestered to the Doctor we come to expect of our Frankenstein stories; steampunk-like inventions soon emerge—a motorized carriage with horse figurehead, city-wide gondola systems, fantastical luxury cruisers—that paint an uncanny world just different enough from history to captivate with great ease.

 

Emma Stone and Mark Ruffalo in POOR THINGS. Photo by Atsushi Nishijima. Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2023 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

 

These seemingly out-of-place surprises are truly the magical blood flowing through Poor Things and are by no means contained only to visual world-building elements. In the script and many of the actors’ performances there are modern turns of phrase—most notably Wedderburn’s near-constant swears and cries of frustration—that pull one deeper into each conversation. Stone and Ruffalo wield these modern flares with ease and intrigue, and the film’s setting and events cater beautifully to them, a furious, impassioned, and timeless ballroom dance scene exemplifying this tactic.

 

There are aspects of these surprise stylized elements that at times can jar further than feels necessary. Godwin burps up massive, floating bubbles of self-inserted bodily fluids. The horizon is a lurid collection of contrived colours. Bella’s outfits often resemble flamboyant anime costumes brought to life in the wrong genre. Yet each of these elements works so splendidly in the context of this twisting reimagining of a classic tale that it is hard to find fault in their use. It is the journey of an innocent into a strange new world, and Lanthimos has found myriad ways to make it feel as such and to remind us just how odd, frightening, and beautiful our world can be to new eyes.

 

Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures.

 

Poor Things is not a revolutionary film. It is not doing something entirely unheard of within the forum it presents itself. It is not changing how we will do and view film from now on. But despite that, it feels so entirely new, a spectral breath of fresh air that sits somewhere between the spectacle of modern blockbusters and the claustrophobic indies. One can’t help but feel a similar adoration and appreciation to the sleeper hit of Everything Everywhere All at Once—we are being given the gift of profound and absurd existential entertainment in our cinema, and it is a gift most enthusiastically accepted.

The Runner pulled from Belfry Theatre amidst mounting tensions

We have been no stranger to gruesome conflicts at borders these past years. But the Israel-Palestine conflict that still rages on has been a much more divisive matter of public opinion than the likes of the war in Ukraine. This conflict has of course been longstanding, so it is unsurprising that an artist may have attempted to capture an aspect of it even a year ago. But with tensions heightening across the sea and at home, it has been decided that there’s no room for The Runner at The Belfry.

 

The Belfry is a theatre company based in a refurbished church in Victoria, BC. Running since 1976, it has become a cultural institution in Victoria throughout its nearly half-century existence. One of its recurrent offerings is its SPARK Festival, an annual exhibition of “innovative and alternative work from across Canada.” The Runner was selected as part of this year’s lineup, but as of this week the company has made the decision to withdraw the play from its run.

 

The Runner is a play written by Toronto-based playwright and actor Christopher Morris that has been circulating over the past several years. The synopsis on its physical release reads: “Z.A.K.A is an Orthodox Jewish volunteer force in Israel that collects the remains of Jews killed in accidents. When Jacob, a Z.A.K.A volunteer, makes the split-second decision to treat a young woman — instead of the soldier she may have killed — his world is changed forever.”

 

There is clearly a wealth of positive intent and examination of humanity in Morris’ work, but The Belfry has been the target of multiple protests by both sides of the conflict and has begun to be vandalized in the process. Comments on their social media have been vitriolic and presume much of the values of those in charge, and, unfortunately, it seems their aim to avoid conflict through this decision has done little of that desired goal.

 

While the debate rages on around The Belfry about both the importance of art as an exploration of pertinent, sensitive topics as well as the Israel-Palestine war itself, Morris appears to be understanding of the decision. Despite disappointment at the absence of his work as a dialogue, he states: “I hope theatre companies and playwrights do all they can to give audiences the opportunity for dialogue and to build bridges between our silos.”

Dredging list to train Midjourney AI contains 16,000+ names

One of the primary arguments that comes up in relation to the overwhelming tide of AI-generated art is the way these programs are trained. Some skim the web based on pre-determined restrictions, while others are fed specific artists to copy throughout their training—but the pressing issue has to do with the lack of consent of the artists. In this first week of January, a list of artists has come to light that were used to train Midjourney AI.

 

Midjourney is a text-to-image generator that has been at the forefront of this boom of individuals churning out images, often aping the styles of beloved artists such as Van Gogh or Hayao Miyazaki. What seemed like a new digital toy to many at first was quickly understood to be a tool for corporations to devalue artists, utilizing a cheap program instead of paying a creator a suitable wage, and has even resulted in individuals selling works specifically generated to look like real artists’ work.

 

The list that began circulation this past week has over 16,000 names on it, from legendary masters to iconic modern artists to prolific designers and illustrators in popular culture. One such segment is the works of Magic The Gathering artists, and bizarrely enough, the work of children that was commissioned as part of the Extra Life fundraising campaign for children’s hospitals.

 

Online artists are being urged to check for their name on the list to train Midjourney and encouraged to seek legal representation in the matter. While some still claim that the scraping of these programs and their utilization is no different from a human seeking inspiration, it is apples and oranges wherein this machine mind cannot help but at times verbatim reproduce the work of non-consenting artists. Legal battles continue in this strange field of modern art, but a tool has already been given to show a profound lack of care towards artists, and unfortunately can’t easily be put back in the box.

The enduring humanity of Tokyo Godfathers

It’s at times hard to tell what holiday movies will remain in people’s annual cues for long. With a plethora of events across the long, dark winter months to inspire narratives, there’s a wealth of avenues for cinema to take and—more often than not—they’re backed up with cheap and formulaic entertainment. One holiday anime film in particular seems like such an underdog in the grand scheme of offerings but with its unique charms and emotionally raw exploration, Tokyo Godfathers has endured and thrived over the last twenty years.

 

Tokyo Godfathers is the brainchild of iconic director Satoshi Kon, the late creator behind the psychological thriller hits of Perfect Blue and Paprika. While one might not expect a film straddling Christmas and New Years to come out of such a mind, Kon somehow struck gold with this endearing exploration of humanity inspired by the 1948 Western 3 Godfathers. Its popularity has endured strongly enough that the film even received a new dub in 2020, seventeen years after its original release.

 

Courtesy of GKIDS.

 

The film follows a homeless trio in the streets of Japan—an alcoholic and absent father named Gin, a former drag performer named Hana, and a teenage runaway named Miyuki—as they find a baby abandoned in the trash on Christmas Eve night. As the group desperately tries to follow the thread back to her birth parents, the group ends up falling into the depths of their pasts, grappling with the families they have run from, and doing the best they can with their own abrasive chosen family. A strikingly detailed depiction of grime and glamour with truly cinematic animation, it is a visual and narrative feast of a film.

 

Tokyo Godfathers is a raucous affair to say the very least. There is a shocking level of action packed into its runtime, the majority of it infused with a realistic tension that keeps the momentum charging forward. This high-octane, high-stakes energy is matched beat for beat with profound periods of connection. In a truly humanizing portrayal of people suffering through homelessness, we are subject to very real horrors and societal prejudices directed at this hard-luck trio. Tactfully and artfully veering from bizarre misfortunes on their journey to gutting encounters of mental illness to hilarious odd-couple shenanigans, it’s a film that races across a fine line with exceptional skill.

 

Courtesy of GKIDS.

 

Without a doubt, there are aspects of Tokyo Godfathers that are dated (though mercifully they are mostly front-loaded). Particularly, Gin’s transphobic comments to Hana are an immediate speed bump at the start for a character we’re meant to empathize with. But it’s not wrong that Gin is certainly no paragon of virtue in the start, and in no way does it feel we’re meant to agree with his hate speech. It also feels like the studios understood this need for an update in casting an actual trans actor (Shakina Nayfack) as Hana in the new English dub, whose performance adds a rich depth to the character. The truly mind-boggling and jarringly incongruous score, however, has received no update—but one can’t deny it is part of the film’s charm.

 

While it may not receive the same mainstream idolization that Western animated holiday films get, Tokyo Godfathers offers something that few of those can grasp—true heart. Not heart in the idea of care and warmth for the sake of care and warmth; heart in the purest sense of humanity, showing all of its rough and bleeding aspects but still beating despite it all. There is a tenderness and vulnerability in this film that speaks to the ideals and ills of this season, and it is no wonder that this strange little offering has persisted as a beloved snapshot of life among a pile of, well, trash.

ICYMI: Stand With Us for Philanthropy

From Council on Foundations: 

We invite philanthropic and nonprofit organizations to sign on to the statement below to join the Council on Foundations and Independent Sector in supporting the rights of philanthropic organizations, charitable nonprofits, and individual donors to give in ways that align with their values.  

We believe that philanthropic organizations, charitable nonprofits, and individual donors have the right to exercise their values and views through giving money and other resources, as protected by the First Amendment. That includes efforts to support historically marginalized groups. 

Right now, those fundamental rights are under attack, in the form of a lawsuit by the American Alliance for Equal Rights. AAER has sued the Atlanta-based Fearless Foundation – led by Black women and committed to providing grants, tools, and mentorship to women of color – claiming that its program for Black female entrepreneurs is racially discriminatory.  

While we have different views, funding priorities and values, we, the undersigned, stand together in affirming that: 

Philanthropic donations support our communities in ways that mirror the diversity of our priorities and interests. 
Charitable giving is expressive conduct and a form of nonpartisan, constitutionally protected speech. 
Philanthropy has a positive impact for communities and charitable causes across the country, including supporting historically marginalized groups and communities. 
Philanthropic organizations, charitable nonprofits, and individual donors have the right to exercise their views through giving, as protected by the First Amendment, even when others might disagree with where a funder chooses to donate. However, together, we have a duty to ensure that charitable dollars never promote hate, extremism, and violence.  

We are committed to making it easier for organizations and people to give, across all dimensions of society, not harder. We call on the courts to dismiss this lawsuit and uphold the First Amendment rights of philanthropic organizations, charitable nonprofits, and individual donors to give in ways that align with their values. 

Read the full letter here.